Telehealth in palliative care is being described but not evaluated: a systematic review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 December 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Palliative Care
- Vol. 18 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0495-5
Abstract
Telehealth is growing and its application in palliative care is seen as a solution to pressures on palliative care services. A 2010 UK review reported growing awareness of telehealth in palliative care but a lack of evidence-based research to support its use. The primary aim of this review was to describe the current use of telehealth in palliative care in the UK and evaluate telehealth initiatives against a digital service standard. The secondary aim was to explore whether telehealth results in a reduction in emergency care access. Systematic review of the literature with thematic synthesis. Records were screened and data extracted by two reviewers. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Psychinfo and Cochrane central register for controlled trials were searched using pre-defined terms. Hand searching of conference literature, thesis databases and citation tracking was also conducted. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and can be found at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017080038. The search identified 3807 titles and 30 studies were included in the review. Telehealth was used to support patients and carers, electronic record keeping and professional education. Notably, the number of home telemonitoring initiatives for patients had increased from the 2010 review. Despite this variety, many studies were small scale, descriptive and provided little evidence of evaluation of the service. Ten papers were sufficiently detailed to allow appraisal against the digital service standard and only one of these met all of the criteria to some extent. Seven studies made reference to emergency care access. Although there is growth of telehealth services, there remains a lack of evaluation and robust study design meaning conclusions regarding the clinical application of telehealth in palliative care cannot be drawn. There is insufficient evidence to appreciate any benefit of telehealth on access to emergency care. Future work is needed to evaluate the use of telehealth in palliative care and improve telehealth design in line with digital service standards.Keywords
Funding Information
- NIHR ACF (n/a)
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is the extent of potentially avoidable admissions amongst hospital inpatients with palliative care needs?BMC Palliative Care, 2013
- The complexity of non face-to-face work with patients affected by metastatic breast cancer and their carers. The ‘hidden consultations’ of the clinical nurse specialistEuropean Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2012
- Introducing an electronic Palliative Care Summary (ePCS) in Scotland: patient, carer and professional perspectivesFamily Practice, 2012
- The acceptability of e-technology to monitor and assess patient symptoms following palliative radiotherapy for lung cancerPalliative Medicine, 2011
- An evaluation of the use of Telehealth within palliative care settings across ScotlandPalliative Medicine, 2011
- Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluationBMJ, 2010
- Does Home Telemonitoring after Pulmonary Rehabilitation Reduce Healthcare Use in Optimized COPD?? A Pilot Randomized TrialCOPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2010
- Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Full publication of results initially presented in abstractsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007
- Meeting the challenge: developing systematic reviewing in social policyPolicy & Politics, 2004