Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nwversus NKion chamber calibrations
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 40 (7), 1161-1176
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/40/7/002
Abstract
Determinations of the absorbed dose in a 170 MeV proton beam have been performed using seven ionization chambers of different types: five cylindrical (two FWT IC-18 and three NE-2571, of which one was modified to have the central electrode made of graphite) and two plane parallel (NACP-02 and Roos FK-6). The ionization was converted into absorbed dose in the proton beam according to the generalization of the formalism provided by the IAEA Code of Practice (TRS 277), which enables the use of the same equations for all kinds of beam used in radiotherapy. The absorbed dose obtained with the two IC-18 chambers, a chamber type commonly used as a reference in proton beams, was up to 1.5% lower than that obtained with the Farmer NE-2571 chamber, which was used as the reference in this work when calibration factors in terms of NK were used. To investigate this difference, experimental No factors for six chambers (the two IC-18 chambers, the NACP-02, the FK-6 and two of the NE-2571 chambers) were determined in a high-energy electron beam. The procedure commonly recommended for plane parallel ion chambers was used for all the chambers, using the same reference chamber, a Farmer NE-2571. In the 170 MeV proton beam all the ND factors yielded consistent absorbed dose determinations within the estimated experimental uncertainties. This finding calls into question the value of the product kattkm for the IC-18 chamber given by the IAEA Code of Practice used in this comparison, and points at possible chamber to chamber variations that theoretical kattkm factors cannot predict. The investigations enabled the determination of the pwall(60Co) factor of the Roos FK-6 plane parallel chamber, yielding 1.003+or-0.5%, and a correction for the effect of the aluminium central electrode of NE-2571 chambers in proton beams, equal to 1.003+or-0.4%. Two of the chambers (the plane parallel FK-6 and the modified cylindrical NE-2571) were provided with calibration factors in terms of absorbed dose to water, Nw, at the quality of 60Co by the Primary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory in Germany (PTB). Using the Nw formalism excellent agreement was found with the determination based on the experimental ND, giving support to the implementation of the Nw procedure in therapeutic proton beams.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A focal stress gradient-dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis in branching arteriesMedical Engineering & Physics, 1996
- A general solution to charged particle beam flattening using an optimized dual-scattering-foil technique, with application to proton therapy beamsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1994
- The calibration and use of plane‐parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: An extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39Medical Physics, 1994
- Current developments in proton therapy: a reviewPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1993
- The Status of High-Energy Photon and Electron Beam Dosimetry Five Years After the Implementation of the Iaea Code of Practice in the Nordic CountriesActa Oncologica, 1993
- Absorbed dose beam quality factors for the dosimetry of high-energy photon beamsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1992
- Estimation of uncertainties in stopping-power ratios using Monte Carlo methodsInternational Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part A. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 1992
- Energy loss of 70 MeV protons in elementsNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 1992
- Uncertainties in dosimetric data and beam calibrationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1990
- A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high‐energy photon and electron beamsMedical Physics, 1983