Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 29 (4), 703-711
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01648-6
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate contrast sensitivity at distance and near after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Setting: Ophthalmologic Institute of Alicante, University Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. Methods: Contrast sensitivity was measured with the Stereo Optical Functional Acuity Contrast Test at distance and near in 21 patients with a refractive multifocal IOL (Array SA-40N, AMO). A control group with a monofocal IOL (SI-40NB, AMO) was also studied to allow comparison of results. Contrast sensitivity was measured 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after IOL implantation. Results: There was a statistically significant greater reduction in contrast sensitivity at distance at all spatial frequencies in the multifocal group than in the monofocal group during the first month. At 3 months, contrast sensitivity at 12 and 18 cycles per deg remained reduced in the multifocal group; contrast sensitivity at the other frequencies did not differ from that in the monofocal group (P > 0.1). At 6, 12, and 18 months, contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies was not significantly different between groups (P > 0.1). There was a statistically significant greater reduction in near contrast sensitivity in the multifocal group than in the monofocal group at all spatial frequencies during the first and third month after surgery (P < .01). No statistically significant differences were found between groups after 6 months (P > 0.1). Contrast sensitivity at distance and near in the multifocal group improved over time (P < .01). Conclusions: The Array IOL provided contrast sensitivity at distance comparable to that obtained with the monofocal IOL between 3 and 6 months after implantation. Near contrast sensitivity improved over time but was always lower than at distance and in the monofocal near-corrected patients, which is acceptable to avoid near visual function degradation.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lensOphthalmology, 2001
- Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lensesBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001
- Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: A multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomesOphthalmology, 2000
- Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantationBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2000
- Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: Clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2000
- A prospective comparative study of the amo array zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lensOphthalmology, 1999
- Clinical evaluation of a five-zone refractive multifocal intraocular lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1996
- Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1994
- Contrast Sensitivity and Reading Through Multifocal Intraocular LensesArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1992
- Multifocal intraocular lensesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1990