Toward a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ): Assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly health assessment questionnaire format
Open Access
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 42 (10), 2220-2230
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199910)42:10<2220::aid-anr26>3.0.co;2-5
Abstract
Objective To develop components of a multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) through the addition of new items in the “patient‐friendly” HAQ format, including advanced activities of daily living (ADL), designed to overcome “floor effects” of the HAQ and modified HAQ (MHAQ) in which patients may report normal scores although they experience meaningful functional limitations, and psychological items, designed to screen efficiently for psychological distress in routine care. Methods The new MDHAQ items, as well as scales for pain, fatigue, helplessness, and global health status on a 2‐page questionnaire, were completed by 688 consecutive patients with various rheumatic diseases, including 162 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 114 with fibromyalgia, 63 with osteoarthritis, 34 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 20 with vasculitis, 18 with psoriatic arthritis, 16 with scleroderma, and 261 with various other rheumatic diseases, over 2 years at a weekly academic rheumatology clinic. Results The new MDHAQ items have good test–retest reliability and face validity. MHAQ scores were highest in patients with RA, and scores for other scales were highest in patients with fibromyalgia. On the advanced ADL, 58% of patients reported difficulty with errands, 68% with climbing stairs, 79% with walking two miles, 87% with participating in sports and games, and 94% with running or jogging two miles. On the psychological items, 75% of patients reported difficulty with sleep, 63% with stress, 61% with anxiety, and 57% with depression. Normal MHAQ scores were reported by 23% of patients and normal HAQ scores by 16% of patients who completed these questionnaires, while fewer than 5% had normal scores on the MDHAQ. Conclusion The MDHAQ items overcome in large part the “floor effects” seen on the HAQ and MHAQ, and are useful to screen for problems with sleep, stress, anxiety, and depression in the “patient‐friendly” HAQ format. These data support the value of completion of a simple 2‐page patient questionnaire by each patient at each visit to a rheumatologist.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Depression scales in rheumatoid arthritis: criterion contamination in interpretation of patient responsesPatient Education and Counseling, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Self‐report questionnaires in five rheumatic diseases comparisons of health status constructs and associations with formal education levelArthritis & Rheumatism, 1989
- Psychosocial factors and disease outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: Old problems, new solutions, and a future agendaArthritis & Rheumatism, 1989
- Validity of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale in arthritis populationsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1989
- Use of self‐report activities of daily living questionnaires in osteoarthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluationClinical Psychology Review, 1988
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977
- Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingThe Gerontologist, 1969