GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 64 (4), 407-415
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment EffectsSystematic Review and Meta-regression AnalysisJAMA, 2010
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 2009
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological studyBMJ, 2008
- Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapsePublished by Wiley ,2007
- Meta-analysis of flavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoidsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- The effect of beta‐blocker therapy on quality of life in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysisPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2006
- Chloroquine or amodiaquine combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for treating uncomplicated malariaCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005
- Low-molecular-weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacyBlood, 2005
- An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- β-Blockers in Congestive Heart Failure: A Bayesian Meta-AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001