The effects of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonists, and VIP and peptide histidine isoleucine antisera on non‐adrenergic, non‐cholinergic relaxations of tracheal smooth muscle

Abstract

1 The effects of several drugs, including antagonists of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and antisera to VIP or peptide histidine isoleucine (PHI), on relaxation responses of guinea-pig isolated trachea to electrical field stimulation (EFS) have been examined. 2 β-Adrenoceptor blockade with propranolol only partially blocked the inhibitory response to EFS, but had no effect in tissues from animals pretreated with 6-hydroxydopamine or reserpine. 3 Neither adenosine deaminase, in the presence of dipyridamole, nor the potent adenosine antagonist NPC205 (1,3-n-dipropyl-8-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-xanthine) had any effect on the inhibitory response to EFS. 4 The VIP antagonists, [Ac-Tyr¹, d-Phe²]-GRF(1–29)-NH₂ and [4-Cl-d-Phe⁶, Leu¹⁷]-VIP had no effect on the inhibitory response to EFS. Moreover, they were without effect on responses to exogenous VIP or PHI. 5 Overnight incubation with VIP antisera markedly reduced the inhibitory response to EFS. PHI antisera had a similar, but smaller effect. 6 In the presence of a concentration of VIP that is maximal for its relaxant effect, inhibitory responses to electrical stimulation were greatly inhibited. 7 Naloxone and reactive blue 2 each had no effect on inhibitory responses indicating that endogenous opioids and adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) respectively are not involved. 8 The results suggest that VIP and PHI, but not adenosine, contribute to non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic inhibitory nerve responses of guinea-pig trachea. Moreover, the surprising lack of effect of both VIP antagonists on these responses, and in particular, on responses to exogenous VIP, suggests that the receptors mediating VIP-induced tracheal relaxation are different from those that mediate pancreatic secretion.