Quality of Life, Patients’ Satisfaction, and Aesthetic Outcome after Pedicled or Free TRAM Flap Breast Surgery
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 107 (5), 1142-1153
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200104150-00007
Abstract
Breast reconstructions after breast cancer surgery are primarily performed to improve patients' quality of life. This study was performed to investigate patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction and quality of life after pedicled or free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery and to evaluate the aesthetic result of the breast reconstruction both objectively and subjectively.Sixty-three patients (36 with pedicled flaps and 27 with free TRAM flaps) answered two questionnaires; of this group, 53 (27 with pedicled flaps and 26 with free TRAM flaps) participated in an aesthetic evaluation. The questionnaires consisted of two parts: one study-specific part concerning satisfaction with the result of the breast reconstruction, the other a standardized health-related quality of life part, the Short Form-36 questionnaire. The aesthetic examination consisted of an objective part in which various distances on the reconstructed and contralateral breast were measured. The volumes of the breasts were measured using a thermoplastic cast system. The softness of the breasts was assessed using applanation tonometry. A panel consisting of three plastic surgeons looked at four standardized photographs of each patient and evaluated the aesthetic outcome subjectively. The panel evaluated the breast reconstruction on 10 subscales. No statistically significant difference between the surgical groups was seen regarding the patients' satisfaction with the reconstruction. In the patients' self-assessment of the cosmetic outcome, the degree of symmetry was assessed higher in the free TRAM flap group. The health-related quality of life Short Form-36 questionnaire revealed no difference between the pedicled and free flap groups. Compared with a reference population, the breast-reconstructed group felt more tired and "worn out," less peaceful, more unhappy, and more restless. The free flap group reached a higher degree of symmetry in the objective evaluation and received generally higher scores from the three-member panel, compared with the pedicled TRAM flap group. A strong correlation between the patients' and the panel's evaluations of the cosmetic outcome was seen; generally, the panel's evaluation of the cosmetic result of the breast correlated with the satisfaction of the patients.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Prospective and Randomized Study, “SVEA,” Comparing Effects of Three Methods for Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life, Patient-Defined Problem Areas of Life, and Cosmetic ResultPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- Somatosensory Status after Pedicled or Free TRAM Flap Surgery: A Retrospective StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1999
- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY (NAMED SVEA) OF THREE METHODS OF DELAYED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION. STUDY DESIGN, PATIENTS' PREOPERATIVE PROBLEMS AND EXPECTATIONSScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 1999
- Postmastectomy Reconstruction: Comparative Analysis of the Psychosocial, Functional, and Cosmetic Effects of Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Versus Breast Implant ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1995
- A Comparison of Factors Affecting Aesthetic Outcomes of TRAM Flap Breast ReconstructionsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995
- Breast Reconstruction in Women Treated with Radiation Therapy for Breast CancerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992
- A Comparison of Outcomes Using Three Different Methods of Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992
- Cutaneous blood flow in the TRAM flapBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1992
- Breast Reconstruction with a Transverse Abdominal Island FlapPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1982
- The Free Abdominoplasty Flap and Its Use in Breast Reconstruction: An Experimental Study and Clinical Case ReportScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1979