Performance measurement systems: successes, failures and future – a review
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Measuring Business Excellence
- Vol. 10 (3), 4-14
- https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040610685748
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate Balanced Scorecard by listing claims made by its authors and counterclaims made by other scholars/authors; to justify further research for answering the question “how to measure” in a broad manner; and to justify further research in “dynamic performance measurement systems for global organisations”.Design/methodology/approach: By referencing relevant literature, this paper first evaluates Balanced Scorecard. In its second part, the problems associated with designing and implementing performance measures are listed and lack of research in dynamic performance measurement systems for global organisations is brought to attention. The third part emphasises the need for further research to address the issues mentioned in part two.Findings: The literature reveals that Balanced Scorecard still prevails as the dominant performance measurement system. Successful implementations, however, are much less prevalent and translating Balanced Scorecard to concrete action is still a problematic area.Research limitations/implications: A vast, multidisciplinary volume of literature is available on performance measurement. This review has referenced mostly recent (2000‐2005) literature.Practical implications: This review provides a reference for academics/practitioners by listing and organising major claims made by authors of Balanced Scorecard and counterclaims made by other authors/scholars. This review also brings to notice the difficulties associated with designing and implementing measures, identifying opportunities for ongoing research.Originality/value: This paper forms the basis for a new research direction that considers global organisations and explores the design of a dynamic performance measurement system that operates within an integrated framework of business processes.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the performance of a performance measureMeasuring Business Excellence, 2005
- Forget value‐based management and the balanced scorecard! An interview with Professor Ken MerchantMeasuring Business Excellence, 2005
- Developing a performance measurement audit template – a benchmarking studyMeasuring Business Excellence, 2004
- How process defines performance managementInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2004
- Measuring knowledge assets – implications of the knowledge economy for performance measurementMeasuring Business Excellence, 2004
- Beyond BSC: a process based approach to performance managementMeasuring Business Excellence, 2003
- Global virtual teams: what impacts their design and performance?Team Performance Management, 2002
- A conversation with Göran RoosJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2002
- WHY MEASUREMENT INITIATIVES FAILMeasuring Business Excellence, 2000
- Virtual team interaction: assessment, consequences, and managementTeam Performance Management, 2000