Coevolution in bicoid‐dependent promoters and the inception of regulatory incompatibilities among species of higher Diptera
- 11 July 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Evolution & Development
- Vol. 4 (4), 265-277
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.02016.x
Abstract
To what extent and in what way do gene promoters and their transacting regulatory proteins coevolve? In this and in earlier publications we show that the Bicoid-dependent promoters of the segmentation genes hunchback and tailless in species of higher Diptera (Drosophila, Musca, Calliphora, and Lucilia) are different with respect to the copy number, spacing, sequence, and orientation of Bicoid binding sites. At the same time there are significant amino acid differences in the Bicoid homeodomain. To test these interspecific differences, we used a series of functional assays, starting with the analysis of Bicoid binding affinities of individual sites, through to transgene rescue experiments, to compare within-species with between-species mixtures of Bicoid homeodomains and hunchback or tailless promoters. We observed that components taken from different species interact with less efficiency compared with those taken from within the same species. Our interpretation is that such interspecific incompatibilities are a consequence of interactive genetic elements coevolving one with another, hence maintaining functional compatibility within each species. At the same time such a process allows differences to accumulate between species regarding the precise molecular basis whereby the common function is effected.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid restructuring of bicoid‐dependent hunchback promoters within and between Dipteran species: implications for molecular coevolutionEvolution & Development, 2001
- Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer elementNature, 2000
- From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gapsTrends in Genetics, 1996
- Regulatory and coding regions of the segmentation gene hunchback are functionally conserved between Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogasterMechanisms of Development, 1994
- Control of tailless expression by bicoid, dorsal and synergistically interacting terminal system regulatory elementsMechanisms of Development, 1993
- Challenges: Observing development through evolutionary eyes: A practical approachBioEssays, 1992
- The Drosophila gene tailless is expressed at the embryonic termini and is a member of the steroid receptor superfamilyCell, 1990
- Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centresNature, 1988
- Finger protein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genesNature, 1987
- Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolutionNature, 1982