Comparative Evaluation of Various Total Antioxidant Capacity Assays Applied to Phenolic Compounds with the CUPRAC Assay
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 July 2007
- Vol. 12 (7), 1496-1547
- https://doi.org/10.3390/12071496
Abstract
It would be desirable to establish and standardize methods that can measure the total antioxidant capacity level directly from vegetable extracts containing phenolics. Antioxidant capacity assays may be broadly classified as electron transfer (ET)− and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)−based assays. The majority of HAT assays are kinetics-based, and involve a competitive reaction scheme in which antioxidant and substrate compete for peroxyl radicals thermally generated through the decomposition of azo compounds. ET−based assays measure the capacity of an antioxidant in the reduction of an oxidant, which changes colour when reduced. ET assays include the ABTS/TEAC, CUPRAC, DPPH, Folin-Ciocalteu and FRAP methods, each using different chromogenic redox reagents with different standard potentials. This review intends to offer a critical evaluation of existing antioxidant assays applied to phenolics, and reports the development by our research group of a simple and low-cost antioxidant capacity assay for dietary polyphenols, vitamins C and E, and human serum antioxidants, utilizing the copper(II)-neocuproine reagent as the chromogenic oxidizing agent, which we haved named the CUPRAC (cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity) method. This method offers distinct advantages over other ET−based assays, namely the selection of working pH at physiological pH (as opposed to the Folin and FRAP methods, which work at alkaline and acidic pHs, respectively), applicability to both hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants (unlike Folin and DPPH), completion of the redox reactions for most common flavonoids (unlike FRAP), selective oxidation of antioxidant compounds without affecting sugars and citric acid commonly contained in foodstuffs and the capability to assay –SH bearing antioxidants (unlike FRAP). Other similar ET–based antioxidant assays that we have developed or modified for phenolics are the Fe(III)− and Ce(IV)−reducing capacity methods.Keywords
This publication has 139 references indexed in Scilit:
- CUPRAC total antioxidant capacity assay of lipophilic antioxidants in combination with hydrophilic antioxidants using the macrocyclic oligosaccharide methyl β-cyclodextrin as the solubility enhancerReactive and Functional Polymers, 2007
- Sensitivity enhancement of CUPRAC and iron(III)-phenanthroline antioxidant assays by preconcentration of colored reaction products on a weakly acidic cation exchangerReactive and Functional Polymers, 2007
- Antioxidant properties of bucillamine: Possible mode of actionBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2006
- Structure–radical scavenging activity relationships of phenolic compounds from traditional Chinese medicinal plantsLife Sciences, 2005
- Standardized Methods for the Determination of Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolics in Foods and Dietary SupplementsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005
- The Chemistry behind Antioxidant Capacity AssaysJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005
- Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts Containing Phenolic CompoundsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999
- Comparative study of radical scavenger and antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds from Vitis vinifera cell cultures using in vitro testsLife Sciences, 1997
- Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acidsFree Radical Biology & Medicine, 1996
- Thiobarbituric acid‐reactivity following iron‐dependent free‐radical damage to amino acids and carbohydratesFEBS Letters, 1981