Yearly Prostate Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination Fluctuations in a Screened Population
Open Access
- 31 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 181 (5), 2071-2076
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.029
Abstract
Prostate biopsy is often recommended based on elevations in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). We investigate the stability of a single positive test over the next 3 consecutive years. 2578 participants in a San Antonio screening cohort with two or more consecutive annual PSA and DRE tests were identified. Numbers of occurrences of an elevated PSA (≥ 2.5 ng/ml) followed by one or more non-elevated PSA results were compared with similar fluctuations of DRE from abnormal to normal. Among 2272 men who never had a biopsy performed during the study, in 23.3% of 744 incidences of an elevated PSA with one year of follow-up, the next PSA was not elevated, in 19.5% of 353 incidences of an elevated PSA with two years of follow-up, the next two consecutive PSAs were not elevated, and in 17.5% of 68 incidences of an elevated PSA with three years of follow-up, the next three consecutive PSAs were not elevated. Rates were similar but lower among 221 men with one or more negative biopsies during the study and 85 men who eventually developed prostate cancer during the study. In contrast, approximately 70% of abnormal DREs were normal the following year, even among prostate cancer cases, and in the majority of incidences, remained normal the next 2 to 3 consecutive years. Occurrences of reversed PSA cutpoint- or abnormal DRE-based decisions to biopsy one or more years after the initial test are not uncommon, suggesting repetition of these tests.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Digital Rectal Examination and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer—a Study Based on 8 Years and Three Screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), RotterdamEuropean Urology, 2009
- The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancerThe Prostate, 2008
- Cancer Statistics, 2008CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- Assessing Individual Risk for Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Controversies regarding screening for prostate cancerBJU International, 2007
- Assessing Prostate Cancer Risk: Results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006
- Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings From the Initial Screening Round of a Randomized TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per MilliliterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- The Influence of Finasteride on the Development of Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- RISKS AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSYJournal of Urology, 1998