An integrated population‐averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster‐unit trials
- 18 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (8), 1235-1254
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1379
Abstract
While the mixed model approach to cluster randomization trials is relatively well developed, there has been less attention given to the design and analysis of population‐averaged models for randomized and non‐randomized cluster trials. We provide novel implementations of familiar methods to meet these needs. A design strategy that selects matching control communities based upon propensity scores, a statistical analysis plan for dichotomous outcomes based upon generalized estimating equations (GEE) with a design‐based working correlation matrix, and new sample size formulae are applied to a large non‐randomized study to reduce underage drinking. The statistical power calculations, based upon Wald tests for summary statistics, are special cases of a general power method for GEE. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of paramedic practitioners in attending 999 calls from elderly people in the community: cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2007
- Regression analysis with clustered dataStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Cohort versus cross‐sectional design in large field trials: Precision, sample size, and a unifying modelStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Social Experiments: Some Developments over the Past Fifteen YearsAnnual Review of Psychology, 1994
- PARAMETERS TO AID IN THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY TRIALSEpidemiology, 1994
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity ScoreThe American Statistician, 1985
- Group ComparabilityEvaluation Review, 1984