Have Standardized Patient Examinations Stood the Test of Time and Experience?
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Teaching and Learning in Medicine
- Vol. 16 (2), 215-222
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1602_16
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordingsBMJ, 2002
- Physical Diagnosis Findings among Persons Applying to Work as Standardized PatientsAcademic Medicine, 2001
- The Patient Findings QuestionnaireAcademic Medicine, 1999
- Performance of “standardized examinees” in a standardized-patient examination of clinical skillsAcademic Medicine, 1997
- Standardized patientsʼ accuracy in recording examineesʼ behaviors using checklistsAcademic Medicine, 1997
- Technical issuesAcademic Medicine, 1993
- Standardized (simulated) patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance check-list itemsMedical Education, 1992
- Using unannounced simulated patients to evaluate sexual risk assessment and risk reduction skills of practicing physiciansAcademic Medicine, 1991
- Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized‐patient ratingTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 1991
- Factors associated with the accuracy of standardized patient presentationAcademic Medicine, 1990