The Effect of Electronic Record Keeping and Transesophageal Echocardiography on Task Distribution, Workload, and Vigilance During Cardiac Anesthesia
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 87 (1), 144-155
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199707000-00019
Abstract
Electronic anesthesia record keeping (EARK) systems increasingly are used in the operating room, but studies have only recently begun to investigate their effect on anesthesia task performance. Task analysis, workload assessment, and vigilance assessment techniques were used to study senior residents providing anesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures. The impact on anesthesia residents' workload of the routine use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) also was examined. Before each case, the record keeping system was randomly selected as either electronic (Diatek ARKIVE[trademark symbol]; EARK) or traditional manual recording (MAN). Twenty CABG procedures (10 EARK and 10 MAN) were examined, with observation commencing with anesthetic induction and terminating on initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. The activities of each resident, divided into 32 task categories (e.g., “laryngoscopy,” “observe monitors,” etc.), were recorded by a trained observer using a computer. The response latency to a randomly activated alarm light was used as a measure of vigilance ("vigilance latency"). Workload was rated by subject and observer at random 10- to 15-min intervals throughout the case. Data analysis included calculation of workload density (number of tasks/min multiplied by task-specific workload values) and task-links (relationship between sequential tasks). The two groups had a similar distribution of tasks before intubation. In only 4 of the 20 cases studied did any manual record keeping occur before intubation. After intubation, the EARK group spent less time record keeping and using the TEE but more time observing the monitors and conversing with the attending physician than the MAN group did. All subjects reported significantly higher workload scores before intubation compared with after intubation. Similarly, vigilance latency was greater before intubation compared with after intubation (57 vs. 31 s; P This study provides an objective description of the task distribution and workload during the administration of anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Under the conditions of this study, EARK use modestly decreased the time spent record keeping during the postintubation prebypass period. However, there was no effect of EARK either on vigilance or several measures of workload. TEE use was associated with increased workload and possibly decreased vigilance.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of automatic record keeping on vigilance and record keeping timeBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995
- The impact of technology on physician cognition and performanceJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1995
- Manual record keeping is not necessary for anesthesia vigilanceJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1995
- An Objective Methodology for Task Analysis and Workload Assessment in Anesthesia ProvidersAnesthesiology, 1994
- A331 Naloxonazine blocks alfentanil-induced analgesia but not muscle rigidity in the ratAnesthesiology, 1990
- A SECOND TIME-STUDY OF THE ANAESTHETIST’S INTRAOPERATIVE PERIODBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990
- A TIME AND MOTION STUDY OF THE ANAESTHETIST'S INTRAOPERATIVE TIMEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1988
- Computerized Anesthesia Records May Be DangerousAnesthesiology, 1986
- THE ANAESTHETIC MACHINE-A STUDY OF FUNCTION AND DESIGNBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1980
- Analysis of Tasks and Human Factors in Anesthesia for Coronary-Artery BypassAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1976