Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn?
Open Access
- 15 May 1993
- Vol. 306 (6888), 1319-1322
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6888.1319
Abstract
The Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer is used in all aspects of blood pressure research, from clinical trials to evaluation of new blood pressure recorders. It is designed to reduce observer bias in blood pressure measurement. The problem is that it also underestimates blood pressure. Furthermore, this was first reported more than two decades ago. In this paper Rónán Conroy and colleagues explore the consequences of using an inaccurate instrument for important research and why prestigious organisations like the World Health Organisation continue to use it.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1992
- Blood pressure in childhood: pooled findings of six European studiesJournal Of Hypertension, 1991
- Blood pressure measurement in children: the importance of cuff bladder sizeJournal Of Hypertension, 1989
- A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.Hypertension, 1988
- The world health organization monica project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): A major international collaborationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- The Medical Research Council Trial.Hypertension, 1986
- The seven countries study: 2,289 deaths in 15 yearsPreventive Medicine, 1984
- Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1973
- Experience with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1970
- ZERO-MUDDLER FOR UNPREJUDICED SPHYGMOMANOMETRYThe Lancet, 1963