Implant Surfaces and Interface Processes
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Advances in Dental Research
- Vol. 13 (1), 8-20
- https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130011901
Abstract
The past decades and current R&D of biomaterials and medical implants show some general trends. One major trend is an increased degree of functionalization of the material surface, better to meet the demands of the biological host system. While the biomaterials of the past and those in current use are essentially bulk materials (metals, ceramics, polymers) or special compounds (bioglasses), possibly with some additional coating (e.g., hydroxyapatite), the current R&D on surface modifications points toward much more complex and multifunctional surfaces for the future. Such surface modifications can be divided into three classes, one aiming toward an optimized three-dimensional physical micro-architecture of the surface (pore size distributions, "roughness", etc.), the second one focusing on the (bio) chemical properties of surface coatings and impregnations (ion release, multi-layer coatings, coatings with biomolecules, controlled drug release, etc.), and the third one dealing with the viscoelastic properties (or more generally the micromechanical properties) of material surfaces. These properties are expected to affect the interfacial processes cooperatively, i.e., there are likely synergistic effects between and among them: The surface is "recognized" by the biological system through the combined chemical and topographic pattern of the surface, and the viscoelastic properties. In this presentation, the development indicated above is discussed briefly, and current R&D in this area is illustrated with a number of examples from our own research. The latter include micro- and nanofabrication of surface patterns and topographies by the use of laser machining, photolithographic techniques, and electron beam and colloidal lithographies to produce controlled structures on implant surfaces in the size range 10 nm to 100 μm. Examples of biochemical modifications include mono- or lipid membranes and protein coatings on different surfaces. A new method to evaluate, e.g., biomaterial-protein and biomaterial-cell interactions-the Quartz Crystal Microbalance-is described briefly.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nanostructured model biomaterial surfaces prepared by colloidal lithographyNanostructured Materials, 1999
- Protein absorption and ellipsometry in biomaterial researchBiomaterials, 1998
- Spectroscopic ellipsometry and biology: recent developments and challengesThin Solid Films, 1998
- The Piezoelectric Quartz Crystal Mass and Dissipation Sensor: A Means of Studying Cell AdhesionLangmuir, 1998
- Microfabricated metal and oxide fibers for biological applicationsJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 1995
- Nd:YAG laser machining with multilevel resist kinoformsApplied Optics, 1991
- Titanium‐coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective‐tissue cells differently in vivoJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1990
- Nanometer molecular lithographyApplied Physics Letters, 1986
- Total Internal Reflection FluorescenceAnnual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering, 1984
- The interface zone of inorganic implantsIn vivo: Titanium implants in boneAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 1983