Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: Qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues
- 31 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Gynecologic Oncology
- Vol. 99 (3), S38-S52
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.040
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploratory analysis of quantitative histopathology of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Objectivity, reproducibility, malignancy‐associated changes, and human papillomavirusCytometry Part A, 2004
- Inter‐ and intra‐observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous in traepithelial lesion susing a modified Bethesda grading systemBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasiaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1989
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1982
- Reliability of Histopathologic Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaSouthern Medical Journal, 1982
- Reliability of Histo‐Pathological Diagnosis of Squamous Epithelial Changes of The Uterine CervixActa Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section A Pathology, 1978
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960