The Relationships between Beech (Nothofagus Sp.) Seedfall and Populations of Mice (Mus musculus), and the Demographic and Dietary Responses of Stoats (Mustela erminea), in Three New Zealand Forests
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in Journal of Animal Ecology
- Vol. 52 (1), 141-166
- https://doi.org/10.2307/4593
Abstract
There was a significant relationship between seedfall and populations of mice in all forests studied. Good seadfalls were followed by increases in density of mice and changes in population structure not seen in years when the seedfall failed. Predictability of these changes decreased with increasing diversity of forest composition. Stoats responded both numerically and functionally to increases in mice. There was a significant relationship between the densities of mice and of stoats in summer in 2 forests. In a 3rd, this relationship was modified by the presence nearby of many lagomorphs, an important alternative prey for stoats. The numerical response was due to increased survival, in the uterus or the nest, of young stoats born in spring when mice were abundant, not to increased fecundity of adult female stoats. In all 3 forests, stoats ate significantly more mice in the summers that mice were abundant. Ship rats (Rattus rattus (L.)) were most abundant in the most diverse of the 3 forests. The density index for R. rattus increased there after the 1976 seedfall, but not after that of 1979. A few kiore (R. exulans (Peale)) coexisted with R. rattus in this forest. Stoats did not eat significantly fewer birds when there were plenty of mice, either in summer or autumn, but nevertheless there was a significant negative correlation between the proportions of birds and mice in the diet in autumn. In summer this correlation was very weak and probably non-existent. A bird predation index, which takes into account both the numbers of stoats present and what they ate, suggests that more birds are eaten in summers of peak numbers of mice and stoats because of the strong numerical response by stoats to mice and lack of buffering of birds by mice. In autumn this effect is weakened by a regular seasonal switch by stoats from birds to mice, especially in the autumn of a mouse peak year. The indirect effects of mouse irruptions on populations of forest birds in New Zealand should be further examined. Control of stoats in mouse peak summers could prevent a temporary increase in predation on birds by stoats during the highest risk period, though whether this would benefit the birds is unknown.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in treesBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1980
- Field experiments on the trapping of stoats (Mustela erminea)New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 1980
- Deer Mouse Reproduction and Its Relationship to the Tree Seed CropThe American Midland Naturalist, 1979
- Food as a limiting factor for small rodent numbersOecologia, 1979
- Small Rodent Populations and Food Supply in a Derbyshire AshwoodJournal of Animal Ecology, 1978
- The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecologyOecologia, 1978
- Predation by Weasels (Mustela nivalis) on Breeding Tits (Parus Spp.) in Relation to the Density of Tits and RodentsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1977
- Techniques for trapping and tracking stoats (Mustela erminea); a review, and a new systemNew Zealand Journal of Zoology, 1977
- Interaction entre les micromammifères et la production de semences forestièresAnnals of Forest Science, 1977
- Evaluation of Parasite or Predator ResponsesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1966