FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 16 (9), 1514-1523
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi272
Abstract
Background: Less than 50% of all high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients experience lasting disease-free survival. Risk-adapted treatment strategies require better tools for prediction of outcome. This investigation aimed to assess the value of positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) after two to three cycles of chemotherapy for prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and methods: One hundred and twenty-one patients with high-grade NHL underwent FDG-PET. The therapy response on FDG-PET was correlated to PFS and OS using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Cox regression analyses were employed to test for independence of known pretreatment prognostic factors. Results: Fifty FDG-PET scans were negative, 19 scans showed minimal residual uptake (MRU), and 52 scans were positive. The estimated 5 year PFS was 88.8% for the PET-negative group, 59.3% for the MRU group, and 16.2% for the PET-positive group. Kaplan–Meier analyses showed strong associations between FDG-PET results and PFS (P P Conclusions: Early interim FDG-PET is an accurate and independent predictor of PFS and OS. An early assessment of chemotherapy response with FDG-PET could provide the basis for selection of patients for alternative therapeutic strategies.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Traditional Treatment Approaches in B-cell Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaLeukemia & Lymphoma, 2003
- Current Treatment Options in Aggressive LymphomaLeukemia & Lymphoma, 2003
- Early Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Versus Conventional Chemotherapy as Front-Line Therapy in High-Risk, Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: An Italian Multicenter Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Randomized Study to Evaluate the Use of High-Dose Therapy as Part of Primary Treatment for “Aggressive” LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab Compared with CHOP Alone in Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large-B-Cell LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- 18-FDG-PET as a Prognostic Indicator in the Treatment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-Comparison with CTLeukemia & Lymphoma, 2000
- CHOP may have been part of the beginning but certainly not the end: issues in risk-related therapy of large-cell lymphoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation as Compared with Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapses of Chemotherapy-Sensitive Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- A Predictive Model for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of a Standard Regimen (CHOP) with Three Intensive Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993