A population‐based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981–2000
Open Access
- 19 April 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 111 (5), 485-490
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00117.x
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of policy and practice changes in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome on prenatal diagnosis and live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome. Design Population‐based observational study. Setting Greater Paris. Population Residents of Greater Paris who gave birth or had a termination of pregnancy in Paris during 1981–2000(∼38,000 births per year). Methods Data on 1916 cases of Down's syndrome were obtained from the Paris Registry of Congenital Anomalies. Analyses included binomial and Poisson models of trends in three periods: prior to 1989(reference period), 1989–1995(reimbursement of amniocentesis in case of ultrasonographic anomalies) and 1996–2000(widespread use of reimbursed serum screening and measurement of nuchal translucency). Main outcome measures Trends in proportion of Down's syndrome cases diagnosed prior to birth; live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome. Results The proportion of Down's syndrome detected prenatally for women 38 years of age, the increase was 1.5‐fold. The live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome decreased by 3% per year (prevalence ratio [PR] 0.97, 95% CI 0.96–0.99); the age‐adjusted decrease was 13%. The analysis by period showed that the decrease in live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome was greater after 1988. Conclusions By far, most cases of Down's syndrome are currently detected prenatally in the Parisian population. Consequently, the live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome has decreased despite consistent trends towards delayed childbearing. These positive public health effects have to be balanced against a relatively high rate of amniocentesis and the potentially negative consequences of widespread prenatal testing for individuals born with Down's syndrome.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of maternal age and education on the pattern of prenatal testing: Implications for the use of antenatal screening as a solution to the growing number of amniocentesesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Fetuses with Down's Syndrome detected by prenatal screening are more likely to abort spontaneously than fetuses with Down's Syndrome not detected by prenatal screeningBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- Fetuses with Down's Syndrome detected by prenatal screening are more likely to abort spontaneously than fetuses with Down's Syndrome not detected by prenatal screening.2003
- Increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11–14 weeksPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Efficacy of screening for fetal down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy.American Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Integrated Screening for Down's Syndrome Based on Tests Performed during the First and Second TrimestersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Delayed childbearingEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1997
- Attributions for disability: The influence of genetic screeningSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Reducing the Need for Amniocentesis in Women 35 Years of Age or Older with Serum Markers for ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994