Strategies for Social Inference: A Similarity Contingency Model of Projection and Stereotyping in Attribute Prevalence Estimates.
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Vol. 87 (5), 573-585
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573
Abstract
Most models of how perceivers infer the widespread attitudes and qualities of social groups revolve around either the self (social projection, false consensus) or stereotypes (stereotyping). The author suggests people rely on both of these inferential strategies, with perceived general similarity moderating their use, leading to increased levels of projection and decreased levels of stereotyping. Three studies featuring existing individual differences in perceived similarity as well as manipulated perceptions supported the predictions, with similarity yielding increased projection to, and decreased stereotyping of, various in-groups and out-groups. Evidence that projection and stereotyping may serve as inferential alternatives also emerged. The model and accompanying results have implications for research on social comparison and projection, stereotyping and prejudice, and social inference.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inside the Mind Reader's Tool Kit: Projection and Stereotyping in Mental State Inference.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- On the status of self in social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003).Psychological Review, 2003
- Return of the ego--Self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003).Psychological Review, 2003
- Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000
- The Role of Stereotyping in Overconfident Social PredictionSocial Cognition, 1998
- Whistling in the Dark: Exaggerated Consensus Estimates in Response to Incidental Reminders of MortalityPsychological Science, 1996
- The False Consensus Effect and Overconfidence: Flaws in Judgment or Flaws in How We Study Judgment?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993
- Integrative bargaining in a competitive marketOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- Empirical contributions: Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorizationBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1984