Clinical trials of antidepressant medications are producing meaningless results
Open Access
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 183 (2), 102-104
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.2.102
Abstract
A recent alert from the UK Committee on Safety of Medicines stated that the dangers of treatment of depression with paroxetine outweigh the benefits in those under 18. Such a warning should focus our minds on the evidence on which clinical practice is based. Antidepressant treatment of depression in the under-18s has been thought to be justified because clinical trials show that it works so well in over-18s. But is that a reasonable assessment of the evidence? Kirsch et al (2002) use the analogy of ‘The Emperor's New Clothes' to describe the findings from their meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants. They conclude that antidepressant medication appears to have only a small effect on outcome over and above placebo. In this analogy psychiatry is the emperor, drug trials are the fraudsters and the deception is being revealed by a growing body of critical opinion proposing that, once methodological problems with clinical trials are taken into account, antidepressants either do not work at all or have an effect that is so small as to be clinically unimportant (Andrews, 2001; Moncrieff, 2002). A large number of randomised placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants have been carried out over the past decades, mostly funded by the pharmaceutical industry, and it is now recognised that about 50% of negative trials go unpublished (Thase, 1999). Meanwhile, unipolar depression has jumped into the top five of the world's total burden of disease, and there is an imperative need for effective and safe treatments. Do we need more randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressant medications, or has that research paradigm outlived its usefulness? In this month's debate, Professor Gordon Parker, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Australia, and Drs Ian Anderson and Peter Haddad from the University of Manchester discuss whether clinical trials for antidepressant medication produce meaningless results.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antidepressant effects: The suit may be small, but the fabric is real.Prevention & Treatment, 2002
- Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: A meta-analysisThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- Placebo Response in Studies of Major DepressionJAMA, 2002
- Effect of Hypericum perforatum (St John's Wort) in Major Depressive DisorderJAMA, 2002
- Are Subjects in Pharmacological Treatment Trials of Depression Representative of Patients in Routine Clinical Practice?American Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- ‘New’ and ‘old’ antidepressants: All equal in the eyes of the lore?The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- Placebo response in depression: Bane of research, boon to therapyThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- Concerns About Clinical Drug TrialsJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2000
- Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 1993 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelinesJournal of Psychopharmacology, 2000
- A meta-analysis of antidepressant outcome under "blinder" conditions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1992