Cost-effectiveness of general anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia in fast-track abdominal benign hysterectomy
- 31 October 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 205 (4), 326.e1-326.e7
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.043
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fast-track hysterectomy: a randomised, controlled studyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2010
- Costs and Effects of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Systematic Review of Controlled TrialsPLOS ONE, 2009
- Risks and side‐effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta‐analysisAnaesthesia, 2009
- Evidence-Based Surgical Care and the Evolution of Fast-Track SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Fast-track colorectal surgeryThe Lancet, 2008
- Effect of laxatives on gastrointestinal functional recovery in fast-track hysterectomy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Outcomes after Total versus Subtotal Abdominal HysterectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Fast track hysterectomyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2001
- Intraoperative and Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Intrathecal Opioids in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section with Spinal AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1999