Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy
- 21 January 2009
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 1,p. CD007107
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007107.pub2
Abstract
Background Febrile neutropenia (FN) and other infectious complications are some of the most serious treatment‐related toxicities of chemotherapy for cancer, with a mortality rate of 2% to 21%. The two main types of prophylactic regimens are granulocyte (G‐CSF) or granulocyte‐macrophage colony stimulating factors (GM‐CSF); and antibiotics, frequently quinolones or cotrimoxazole. Important current guidelines recommend the use of colony stimulating factors when the risk of febrile neutropenia is above 20% but they do not mention the use of antibiotics. However, both regimens have been shown to reduce the incidence of infections. Since no systematic review has compared the two regimens, a systematic review was undertaken. Objectives To compare the effectiveness of G‐CSF or GM‐CSF with antibiotics in cancer patients receiving myeloablative chemotherapy with respect to preventing fever, febrile neutropenia, infection, infection‐related mortality, early mortality and improving quality of life. Search methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, databases of ongoing trials, and conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology (1980 to 2007). We planned to include both full‐text and abstract publications. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials comparing prophylaxis with G‐CSF or GM‐CSF versus antibiotics in cancer patients of all ages receiving chemotherapy or bone marrow or stem cell transplantation were included for review. Both study arms had to receive identical chemotherapy regimes and other supportive care. Data collection and analysis Trial eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were done in duplicate. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data. Main results We included two eligible randomised controlled trials with 195 patients. Due to differences in the outcomes reported, the trials could not be pooled for meta‐analysis. Both trials showed non‐significant results favouring antibiotics for the prevention of fever or hospitalisation for febrile neutropenia. Authors' conclusions There is no evidence for or against antibiotics compared to G(M)‐CSFs for the prevention of infections in cancer patients.Keywords
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysisTrials, 2007
- Effect of quinolone prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients on microbial resistance: systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- Antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patientsCancer, 2006
- EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumoursEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2006
- The case of the misleading funnel plotBMJ, 2006
- 2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of White Blood Cell Growth Factors: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice GuidelineJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Lenograstim after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: results of a double-blind, randomized trialBone Marrow Transplantation, 2004
- Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without a quinolone in the prevention of infection in cancer patientsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Infection in cancer patients: A continuing associationAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1986