Comparison of stage migration patterns between Europe and the USA: an analysis of 11 350 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Open Access
- 16 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 101 (12), 1513-1518
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07519.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the stage migration patterns in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer in Europe and in the USA in the last 20 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1988 and 2005, RP was performed in 11 350 men: 5739 from Europe and 5611 from the USA. Independent‐samples t‐test and the chi‐square test were, respectively, used for comparisons of means and proportions. The trend test was used to test the statistical significance of trends in proportions over time. RESULTS Temporal patterns in patients’ age, stage and PSA level at presentation were similar on both continents. Conversely, temporal patterns in Gleason sum distribution differed. In the USA, the rate of biopsy Gleason sums of 2–5 decreased from 32.8% to 0.2% (P < 0.001), while the rate of Gleason sums of 7 and 8–10 increased (P < 0.001). Conversely, in Europe the rate of Gleason sums of 6 increased from 40% to 64% (P < 0.001) at the expense of all other Gleason sums. At RP, the rate of Gleason sums of 2–5 decreased on both continents and the rate of a Gleason sum of 7 increased in the USA. Moreover, no important differences in pathological stage trends (organ confinement, extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion) distinguished either population. Finally, the rate of lymph node involvement increased in the USA but remained stable in Europe. CONCLUSIONS Stage and grade migration affected the USA and Europe to different extents. These differences should be accounted for when prediction tools or comparisons between the USA and Europe are considered.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tumour Features in the Control and Screening Arm of A Randomized Trial of Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2006
- High Radical Prostatectomy Surgical Volume is Related to Lower Radical Prostatectomy Total Hospital ChargesEuropean Urology, 2006
- Preoperative Nomogram Predicting the 10-Year Probability of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical ProstatectomyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006
- Validation of a Nomogram for Prediction of Side Specific Extracapsular Extension at Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 2006
- Cancer Statistics, 2005CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2005
- Prostate Cancer Grade Assignment: The Effect of Chronological, Interpretive and Translation BiasJournal of Urology, 2003
- Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 yearsCancer, 2002
- RETRACTED: Prostate cancer screening in the Tyrol, Austria: experience and resultsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2000
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional updatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997