False-negative barium enema in patients with sigmoid cancer and coexistent diverticula
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Gastrointestinal Radiology
- Vol. 10 (1), 171-173
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01893095
Abstract
The false-negative rate of barium enema examinations for the recognition of polypoid sigmoid cancer was evaluated in 167 patients with histologically proven carcinoma. The cases were classified according to the coexistence of sigmoid diverticula. In patients with less than 15 diverticula, 3.1% of lesions were missed, while in those with more than 15 diverticula, 20.4% of tumors were undetected. The overall error rate was 7.2%. Extensive diverticulosis is an important factor limiting the sensitivity of barium enema examinations for the evaluation of sigmoid masses.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perceptionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981
- Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiologyAbdominal Radiology, 1980
- Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema: emphasis on polyp detectionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980
- Colonoscopy in the Diagnosis of Unexplained Rectal BleedingAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- COLONOSCOPY FOR INVESTIGATION OF UNEXPLAINED RECTAL BLEEDINGThe Lancet, 1978
- The double-contrast enema: Myths and misconceptionsGastrointestinal Radiology, 1976
- Colonoscopy in the management of colon polypsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974
- Diverticular disease of the colon: a deficiency disease of Western civilization.BMJ, 1971
- Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. A review of 521 casesBMJ, 1969
- Postmortem survey of diverticular disease of the colon. I. Diverticulosis and diverticulitis.Gut, 1969