The human factor in driving accidents An overview of approaches and problems
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 25 (10), 867-877
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138208925047
Abstract
Several approaches to accident involvement are considered. Rather than exhaustively review the empirical data an attempt is made to concentrate on the major issues with particular emphasis on the conceptual difficulties which each approach faces. The confusion surrounding the concept of accident proneness is considered and an alternative approach to the study of individual differences advocated. Some major issues and problems facing research on alcohol and drugs are discussed. The evidence refuting 'biorhythm’ theory is considered. Some of the major empirical and conceptual difficulties facing driver improvement schemes, environmental modification programmes and risk taking theories are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of safety belt usage following introduction of a safety belt wearing lawAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1981
- A review of research on the protection afforded to occupants of cars by seat belts which provide upper torso restraintAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1979
- The Influence of ‘Biorhythm’ on Accident Occurrence and PerformanceErgonomics, 1977
- The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Relation of a test of attention to road accidents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
- Cautionary Note on Measurement of Field IndependencePerceptual and Motor Skills, 1972
- Individual Differences in Attention and the Prediction of Flight CriteriaPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
- Relationship of Field Dependence and Motor-Vehicle-Accident InvolvementPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
- Menstruation and AccidentsBMJ, 1960
- ACCIDENT PRONENESSBiometrika, 1950