Intravenous digital subtraction arteriography: a comparison of peripheral versus central contrast injection
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 59 (699), 241-244
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-59-699-241
Abstract
The diagnostic quality of intravenous digital arteriograms using peripheral and central injections in 50 patients were compared. No significant difference in diagnostic quality was noted. It is concluded that a peripheral injection is the most convenient method of performing an intravenous digital arteriogram.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Major complications of central venous catheterisation: A report of five cases and a brief review of the literatureClinical Radiology, 1985
- Complications of digital intravenous angiography: experience in 2488 cervicocranial examinationsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1984
- INTRAVENOUS DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY CONTRAST MEDIA TIME-CONCENTRATION CURVESInvestigative Radiology, 1984
- Intravenous digital subtraction angiography: peripheral versus central injection of contrast material.Radiology, 1983
- Digital subtraction angiography of the intracranial vascular system: comparative study in 55 patientsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients.Radiology, 1981
- Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. Comparison with conventional aortography.Radiology, 1981
- Digital angiography: a perspective.Radiology, 1981
- Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast mediaThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980
- Influence of Injection Site on Arterial Dilution Curves of T-1824Journal of Applied Physiology, 1954