Clinical Utility of Resistance Testing: Retrospective and Prospective Data Supporting Use and Current Recommendations
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 26, S51-S59
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00126334-200103011-00006
Abstract
Summary:Data from retrospective and prospective studies support use of genotypic and phenotypic resistance assays to guide treatment changes when initial or subsequent antiretroviral regimens fail. Several retrospective studies have shown that response to antiretroviral therapy can be predicted based on genotypic analysis of HIV, with baseline genotypic evidence of resistance predicting virologic failure. Other retrospective analyses demonstrated that phenotypic drug sensitivity correlates with increased viral load suppression, particularly when virus remains sensitive to two or three drugs at initiation of the regimen. Furthermore, prospective studies such as VIRADAPT and Genotype-Assisted Antiretroviral Resistance Testing (GART) have substantiated that drug selection based on genotypic assay results yield superior viral suppression compared with empiric treatment assignment. One additional study suggested significant improvement in short-term virologic outcome when phenotypic testing was used to guide treatment selection. Based on these findings, resistance testing is currently recommended for patients with acute HIV infection, those who have failed one or more antiretroviral regimens, and pregnant women. Although these tests move toward becoming a standard of care, several research questions remain: the long-term benefit of resistance testing is not yet certain, the interpretation of specific genotypic resistance patterns needs to be better defined, and clinical cut-off points for phenotypic resistance need to be established. As these issues continue to be studied, resistance testing likely will prove a reliable tool to help plan successful ART strategies. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Richard Haubrich, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Diego, 150 West Washington Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92103-6325 U.S.A. © 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Testing in Adult HIV-1 InfectionJAMA, 2000
- British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapyHIV Medicine, 2000
- Drug susceptibility in HIV infection after viral rebound in patients receiving indinavir-containing regimens.JAMA, 2000
- HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Patterns Predict Response to saquinavir–ritonavir Therapy in Patients in Whom Previous Protease Inhibitor Therapy Had FailedAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Baseline HIV drug resistance profile predicts response to ritonavir-saquinavir protease inhibitor therapy in a community settingAIDS, 1999
- HIV-1 Drug Resistance in Newly Infected IndividualsJAMA, 1999
- Reduced Antiretroviral Drug Susceptibility Among Patients With Primary HIV InfectionJAMA, 1999
- Drug-resistance genotyping in HIV-1 therapy: the VIRAD APT randomi sed controlled trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Novel Four‐Drug Salvage Treatment Regimens after Failure of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor–Containing Regimen: Antiviral Activity and Correlation of Baseline Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility with Virologic OutcomeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999
- HIV RNA and CD4 cell count response to protease inhibitor therapy in an urban AIDS clinic: response to both initial and salvage therapyAIDS, 1999