Extended Use of Dabigatran, Warfarin, or Placebo in Venous Thromboembolism
Top Cited Papers
- 21 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 368 (8), 709-718
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1113697
Abstract
Dabigatran, which is administered in a fixed dose and does not require laboratory monitoring, may be suitable for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. In two double-blind, randomized trials, we compared dabigatran at a dose of 150 mg twice daily with warfarin (active-control study) or with placebo (placebo-control study) in patients with venous thromboembolism who had completed at least 3 initial months of therapy. In the active-control study, recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 26 of 1430 patients in the dabigatran group (1.8%) and 18 of 1426 patients in the warfarin group (1.3%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 2.64; P=0.01 for noninferiority). Major bleeding occurred in 13 patients in the dabigatran group (0.9%) and 25 patients in the warfarin group (1.8%) (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.02). Major or clinically relevant bleeding was less frequent with dabigatran (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71). Acute coronary syndromes occurred in 13 patients in the dabigatran group (0.9%) and 3 patients in the warfarin group (0.2%) (P=0.02). In the placebo-control study, recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 3 of 681 patients in the dabigatran group (0.4%) and 37 of 662 patients in the placebo group (5.6%) (hazard ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.25; P<0.001). Major bleeding occurred in 2 patients in the dabigatran group (0.3%) and 0 patients in the placebo group. Major or clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 36 patients in the dabigatran group (5.3%) and 12 patients in the placebo group (1.8%) (hazard ratio, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.52 to 5.60). Acute coronary syndromes occurred in 1 patient each in the dabigatran and placebo groups. Dabigatran was effective in the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism and carried a lower risk of major or clinically relevant bleeding than warfarin but a higher risk than placebo. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; RE-MEDY and RE-SONATE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00329238 and NCT00558259, respectively.)Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseChest, 2008
- Idraparinux versus Standard Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Duration of Anticoagulation Following Venous ThromboembolismJAMA, 2005
- Fondaparinux or Enoxaparin for the Initial Treatment of Symptomatic Deep Venous ThrombosisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism with the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor XimelagatranNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Comparison of Low-Intensity Warfarin Therapy with Conventional-Intensity Warfarin Therapy for Long-Term Prevention of Recurrent Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Long-Term, Low-Intensity Warfarin Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- A Comparison of Three Months of Anticoagulation with Extended Anticoagulation for a First Episode of Idiopathic Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999