The protagonists of ‘evidence‐based medicine’: arrogant, seductive and controversial
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 2 (1), 9-12
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00024.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Central dimensions of clinical practice evaluation: efficiency, appropriateness and effectiveness ‐ IJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Rationing and evidence‐based medicineJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- Purchasing quality in clinical practice: what on Earth do we mean?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1995
- Meta‐analysis or best‐evidence synthesis?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1995
- Evidence based medicineBMJ, 1995
- Misleading meta-analysisBMJ, 1995
- Magnesium in acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1995
- Changing the measure of quality in the NHS: from purchasing activity to purchasing protocols.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1993
- Effects of intravenous magnesium in suspected acute myocardial infarction: overview of randomised trials.BMJ, 1991