MATCHING UNDER CONCURRENT FIXED‐RATIO VARIABLE‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF FOOD PRESENTATION1
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 27 (1), 171-182
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1977.27-171
Abstract
Four pigeons were exposed to concurrent fixed-ratio, variable-interval schedules of food presentation. The fixed-ratio requirement was either 25, 50, 75, or 100 responses, with the variable-interval schedule parameter held constant at 4 minutes. A delay time was imposed between a changeover from one schedule to the other and subsequent food availability. The delay time was varied at each ratio requirement over four values; no delay, 0-second delay, 1.5-second delay, and 5.0-second delay. As the fixed-ratio requirement or the delay time increased, a greater proportion of the total responses and time spent responding occurred under the variable-interval schedule relative to the proportion of food deliveries under that schedule. Neither relative overall response rate nor relative time spent responding equalled the relative frequency of food presentation, as would be predicted by a linear “matching” model. Rather, these data were described by power functions with slopes of approximately 1.0 and intercepts greater than 1.0. In the terms of Baum's (1974) analysis, these deviations from linear matching represent bias in favor of responding under the interval schedule. Bias, as reflected in the intercept of the power function, was greater for the ratio of time than the ratio of responses.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- TIME ALLOCATION ON CONCURRENT SCHEDULES WITH ASYMMETRICAL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975
- MAXIMIZING AND MATCHING ON CONCURRENT RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975
- AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE AND TIME MATCHING TO REINFORCEMENT IN CONCURRENT RATIO‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973
- EFFECTS OF SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL CHANGEOVER DELAYS ON CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971
- CONCURRENT SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT: EFFECTS OF GRADUAL AND ABRUPT INCREASES IN CHANGEOVER DELAY1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971
- TWO‐KEY CONCURRENT PACED VARIABLE‐INTERVAL PACED VARIABLE‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971
- ON THE TAUTOLOGY OF THE MATCHING LAW1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971
- ON THE LAW OF EFFECT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- CHOICE, RATE OF REINFORCEMENT, AND THE CHANGEOVER DELAY1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- SOME EFFECTS OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT RATE AND CHANGEOVER DELAY IN RESPONSE‐INDEPENDENT CONCURRENT SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968