Utilization of Early Invasive Management Strategies for High-Risk Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 292 (17), 2096-2104
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.17.2096
Abstract
In the past decade, several advances have occurred in the management of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). Pharmacotherapies, such as intravenous platelet glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparin, and clopidogrel, have demonstrated incremental benefits for patients with NSTE ACS.1-4 Complementary to advances in antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapies, catheterization-based strategies for revascularization have also improved.5 Randomized clinical trial data collectively support the use of an early invasive approach with prompt cardiac catheterization compared with an initial conservative approach that reserves cardiac catheterization for patients who develop recurrent ischemia despite medical therapy.6,7 The Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-18 trial found that catheterization within the first 48 hours after presentation was superior to an initial strategy of medical management, particularly in high-risk patients with elevated troponin levels or ST-segment depression.6 Similarly, The Fast Revascularization during Instability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC II) trial demonstrated a significant reduction in long-term mortality with early invasive management for NSTE ACS.8Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2002 update to the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Implications for emergency department practiceAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- An invasive strategy is associated with decreased mortality in patients with unstable angina and non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction: GUSTO IIb trialAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2003
- Effects of Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes without ST-Segment ElevationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Comparison of Early Invasive and Conservative Strategies in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes Treated with the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor TirofibanNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Current Role of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Acute Coronary SyndromesJAMA, 2000
- Improving the quality and dissemination of guidelines: the quest for the Holy Grail.Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2000
- Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction by physician specialty: the effects of comorbidity and functional limitationsAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2000
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Unstable Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction According to the Specialty of the Admitting PhysicianNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996