Spoilt for Choice’: the working classes and educational markets
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Oxford Review of Education
- Vol. 23 (1), 89-101
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498970230108
Abstract
Drawing on data from an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funded study of market forces in secondary education, this paper explores the ambivalence displayed by many working‐class parents in the research to the idea of choice of school. School is frequently associated with powerful memories and images of personal failure. The authors argue: that for working‐class parents choice can sometimes involve complex and powerful accommodations to the idea of ‘school’ and is very different in kind from middle‐class choice making; that social class remains a potent differentiating category in the analysis of home‐school relations; and that choice is a new social device through which social class differences are rendered into educational inequality. Extracts from interview data are quoted to support and illustrate these arguments.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- School choice, social class and distinction: the realization of social advantage in educationJournal of Education Policy, 1996
- Resistance to Schooling and Educational Outcomes: questions of structure and agencyBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1995
- ‘Parental choice’, consumption and social theory: The operation of micro‐markets in educationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1994
- Parents, privilege and the education market‐placeResearch Papers in Education, 1994
- Captured by the Discourse? Issues and concerns in researching ‘parental choice‘British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1994
- The Colonisation of Social Class in EducationBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1994
- Education Markets, Choice and Social Class: the market as a class strategy in the UK and the USABritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1993
- Equality, Class and Power: a case studyBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1985