Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks
Top Cited Papers
- 19 February 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 102 (5), 462-479
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9697
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leak (AL) represents a dreaded complication following colorectal surgery, with a prevalence of 1–19 per cent. There remains a lack of consensus regarding factors that may predispose to AL and the relative risks associated with them. The objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature, focusing on the role of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors in the development of colorectal ALs. Methods A systematic review was performed to identify adjustable and non‐adjustable preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors in the pathogenesis of AL. Additionally, a severity grading system was proposed to guide treatment. Results Of 1707 papers screened, 451 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the review. Significant preoperative risk factors were: male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade above II, renal disease, co‐morbidity and history of radiotherapy. Tumour‐related factors were: distal site, size larger than 3 cm, advanced stage, emergency surgery and metastatic disease. Adjustable risk factors were: smoking, obesity, poor nutrition, alcohol excess, immunosuppressants and bevacizumab. Intraoperative risk factors were: blood loss/transfusion and duration of surgery more than 4 h. Stomas lessen the consequences but not the prevalence of AL. In the postoperative period, CT is the most commonly used imaging tool, with or without rectal contrast, and a C‐reactive protein level exceeding 150 mg/l on day 3–5 is the most sensitive biochemical marker. A five‐level classification system for AL severity and appropriate management is presented. Conclusion Specific risk factors and their potential correction or indications for stoma were identified. An AL severity score is proposed to aid clinical decision‐making.This publication has 182 references indexed in Scilit:
- Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2010
- A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2009
- Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Radiological evaluation of colorectal anastomosesInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2008
- Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resectionCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2008
- Defunctioning Stoma Reduces Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum for CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Anastomotic Leaks After Intestinal AnastomosisAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Operative Strategies for Diverticular PeritonitisAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- A Comparison of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Following ProctocolectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2006