Local health systems in 21st century: who cares?—an exploratory study on health system governance in Amsterdam
Open Access
- 9 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 16 (5), 559-564
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckl010
Abstract
Background: There is a growing awareness that there should be a public health perspective to health system governance. Its intrinsic population health orientation provides the ultimate ground for determining the health needs and governing collaborative care arrangements within which these needs can be met. Notwithstanding differences across countries, population health concerns are not central to European health reforms. Governments currently withdraw leaving governance roles to care providers and/or financiers. Thereby, incentives that trigger the uptake of a public health perspective are often ignored. Methods: In this study we addressed this issue in the city of Amsterdam. Using a qualitative study design, we explored whether there is a public health perspective to the governance practices of the municipality and the major sickness fund in Amsterdam. And if so, what the scope of this perspective is. And if not, why not. Results: Findings indicate that the municipality has a public health perspective to local health system governance, but its scope is limited. The municipality facilitates rather than governs health care provision in Amsterdam. Furthermore, the sickness fund runs major financial risks when adapting a public health perspective. It covers an insured population that partly overlaps the Amsterdam population. Returns on investments in population health are therefore uncertain, as competitors would also profit from the sickness fund's investments. Conclusion: The local health system in Amsterdam is not consistently aligned to the health needs of the Amsterdam population. The Amsterdam case is not unique and general consequences for local health system governance are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary care trustsBMJ, 2004
- Do lower socioeconomic groups use more health services, because they suffer from more illnesses?European Journal of Public Health, 2004
- Social austerity versus structural reform in European health systems: a four-country comparison of health reforms.International Journal of Health Services, 2004
- The Future Of The Public’s Health: Vision, Values, And StrategiesHealth Affairs, 2004
- Public health in the new era: improving health through collective actionThe Lancet, 2004
- Unhealthy European health policy.International Journal of Health Services, 2004
- Who Shall Lead: Is There a Future for Population Health?Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2003
- Free choice of sickness funds in regulated competition: evidence from Germany and The NetherlandsHealth Policy, 2002
- Primary care groups: Can primary care groups and trusts improve health?BMJ, 2001
- Integrated careInternational Journal of Integrated Care, 2001