Prostate carcinoma presentation, diagnosis, and staging
Open Access
- 31 July 2003
- Vol. 98 (6), 1169-1178
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11635
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on the 1998 Patient Care Evaluation (PCE) from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), the authors described contemporary nationwide patterns of prostate carcinoma presentation, diagnosis, and staging. METHODS The authors reviewed 54,212 cases from the 1998 PCE. Demographics, presenting signs and symptoms, tumor characteristics, prostate biopsy techniques, and use of staging modalities were evaluated. RESULTS The mean age of patients in the sample was 68 years. Among patients with available data, 87.5% had a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of 4 ng/mL or higher, 83.1% had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I–II lesions, 80.2% had well or moderately differentiated cancers, and 68.7% of newly diagnosed patients were asymptomatic. Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were more likely to have localized disease (84.6% vs. 78.2%, P < 0.01) and well or moderately differentiated tumors (82.2% vs. 74.6%, P < 0.01). Transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate biopsy was the most common method of tissue confirmation (45.4%). Radionuclide bone scintigraphy was the most frequently employed staging modality (48.7%). Use of various staging evaluations was more frequent among patients at increased risk for disseminated disease (PSA > 10 ng/mL and/or high‐grade tumors) versus patients at lower risk (PSA ≤ 10 and low to moderate‐grade tumors) for metastatic disease (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Most newly diagnosed patients with prostate carcinoma are asymptomatic and have moderately differentiated and organ‐confined disease. Compared with symptomatic patients, tumors in asymptomatic men are associated with lower pretreatment PSA levels, AJCC stage, and tumor grade. Selective use of staging evaluations, based on risk of metastatic disease, may be relatively uncommon. The NCDB remains a unique and rich source of novel patient care information and serves as a national point of reference for prostate carcinoma presentation, diagnosis, and staging. Cancer 2003;98:1169–78. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11635Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2001 American Urological Association Gallup Survey: Changes In Physician Practice Patterns, Satisfaction With Urology, And Treatment Of Prostate Cancer And Erectile DysfunctionJournal of Urology, 2002
- Modeling the impact of the decline in distant stage disease on prostate carcinoma mortality ratesCancer, 2002
- Prostate biopsy techniques and indications: When, where, and how?Seminars in Urologic Oncology, 2002
- Prostate cancer mortality reduction by screening: Power and time frame with complete enrollment in the European randomised screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) trialInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN BLACK AND WHITE MEN WITH ABNORMAL DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LESS THAN 4 NG./ML.Journal of Urology, 2000
- The National Cancer Data Base report on prostate carcinoma after the peak in incidence rates in the U. S.Cancer, 1998
- The early detection of prostate carcinoma with prostate specific antigenCancer, 1997
- The National Cancer Data Base report on longitudinal observations on prostate cancerCancer, 1996
- Prediction of Progression Following Radical ProstatectomyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1996
- Prospective characterization of pathological features of Prostatic Carcinomas Detected Via Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Based ScreeningJournal of Urology, 1996