“By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Sex Research
- Vol. 36 (3), 258-272
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
Abstract
Little is known about how women and men communicate sexual consent. In this study, 378 undergraduate women and men completed a questionnaire designed to examine how they would interpret their date's and their own consent signals in hypothetical scenarios and how they actually communicate consent in heterosexual situations. Although there were no gender differences in ratings of the hypothetical date's behavior, men rated their own behaviors in hypothetical scenarios as more representative of consent than women rated their own behaviors, suggesting that women and men may mean different things when they use the same signals. There were some gender differences in how they conveyed consent in actual situations; furthermore, both women and men reported most often showing their consent to sexual intercourse by making no response. The effect sizes of the gender differences were small. The results suggest that gender‐based miscommunications about consent are possible but unlikely. Thus, miscommunication is an unlikely explanation for rape.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unwanted escalation of sexual intimacy: Male and female perceptions of connotations and relational consequences of resistance messagesCommunication Monographs, 1995
- Eroding stereotypes: College women's attempts to influence reluctant male sexual partnersThe Journal of Sex Research, 1993
- Sexual Precedence Reduces the Perceived Legitimacy of Sexual Refusal: An Examination of Attributions Concerning Date Rape and Consensual SexPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992
- College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactionsThe Journal of Sex Research, 1992
- Effects of Gender and Specific Dating Behaviors on Perceptions of Sex Willingness and Date RapeJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couplesThe Journal of Sex Research, 1989
- Misinterpreted Dating Behaviors and the Risk of Date RapeJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1988
- Proceptive and rejective strategies of U.S. and Canadian college womenThe Journal of Sex Research, 1987
- Sexual Scripts: Social and therapeutic implicationsSexual and Marital Therapy, 1987
- Sexual Intimacy in Dating RelationshipsJournal of Social Issues, 1977