Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 32 (10), 986-995
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.3943
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to understand the diagnostic utility of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-based microarrays for pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 2858 pregnancies with abnormal ultrasounds and normal karyotypes (when performed) tested in our laboratory using CGH microarrays targeted to known chromosomal syndromes with later versions providing backbone coverage of the entire genome. Abnormalities were stratified according to organ system involvement. Detection rates for clinically significant findings among these categories were calculated. Results Clinically significant genomic alterations were identified in cases with a single ultrasound anomaly (n = 99/1773, 5.6%), anomalies in two or more organ systems (n = 77/808, 9.5%), isolated growth abnormalities (n = 2/76, 2.6%), and soft markers (n = 2/77, 2.6%). The following anomalies in isolation or with additional anomalies had particularly high detection rates: holoprosencephaly (n = 9/85, 10.6%), posterior fossa defects (n = 21/144, 14.6%), skeletal anomalies (n = 15/140, 10.7%), ventricular septal defect (n = 14/132, 10.6%), hypoplastic left heart (n = 11/68, 16.2%), and cleft lip/palate (n = 14/136, 10.3%). Conclusions Microarray analysis identified clinically significant genomic alterations in 6.5% of cases with one or more abnormal ultrasound findings; the majority were below the resolution of karyotyping. Larger data sets such as this allow for sub-stratification by specific anomalies to determine risks for genomic alterations detectable by microarray analysis. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Whole‐genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarrayPrenatal Diagnosis, 2009
- Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 casesPrenatal Diagnosis, 2008
- Comparison of microarray‐based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimensPrenatal Diagnosis, 2008
- Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridizationGenetics in Medicine, 2006
- Detection of Chromosome Aberrations in the Second Trimester Using Genetic Amniocentesis: Experience During 1995-2004Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Should determination of the karyotype be systematic for all malformations detected by obstetrical ultrasound?Prenatal Diagnosis, 2005
- Changes in the Utilization of Prenatal DiagnosisObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Prospective ranking of the sonographic markers for aneuploidy: Data of 2143 prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses referred for abnormalities on ultrasoundAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- Ultrasound screening for fetal chromosome anomaliesAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 2000
- Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalitiesThe Lancet, 1992