Comparison of the accuracy of computerized videokeratography and keratometry for use in intraocular lens calculations
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 19 (Supplement), 178-181
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80403-8
Abstract
We compared the accuracy of keratometry and computerized videokeratography (CVK) for use in intraocular lens calculations. We studied 48 eyes of 45 patients having phacoemulsification and posterior chamber lens implantation. Computerized videokeratography was performed with the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System (ECAS). Using the SRK II, SRK/T, and Holladay formulas, we evaluated predictive accuracy calculated with keratometric values and four values derived from ECAS measurements. For each formula, the use of one of the CVK parameters resulted in lower mean absolute errors between actual and predicted postoperative refractive errors and higher percentages of cases with power prediction errors < 0.5 and < 1.0 diopters. Computerized videokeratography may provide a more accurate corneal curvature value than keratometry for use in intraocular lens calculations.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model IJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1992
- Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculationJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1992
- Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formulaJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1990
- Comparison of the SRK II™ formula and other second generation formulasJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1988
- A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculationsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1988
- On the Stiles-Crawford EffectJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1944