Professionalism Reconsidered: Physician Payment In A Small-Practice Environment
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 23 (6), 36-47
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.6.36
Abstract
Traditional fee-for-service health insurance rested on the assumption that doctors have primary responsibility for decisions about care. Managed competition assumed a new model based on corporate medicine, which has not materialized; also, consumers' ability to replace doctors as primary medical decisionmakers is unproven. Data on practice size show that doctors and patients continue to prefer the small-practice setting, where the doctor's role as the patient's agent is salient. The persistence of the small practice suggests that medical professionalism remains the cornerstone of the health system. If so, it may be more appropriate to pursue quality-oriented refinements of traditional payment approaches, rather than radical transformation.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality Incentives: The Case Of U.K. General PractitionersHealth Affairs, 2004
- Are Market Forces Strong Enough To Deliver Efficient Health Care Systems? Confidence Is WaningHealth Affairs, 2004
- From Managed Care To Consumer Health Insurance: The Fall And Rise Of AetnaHealth Affairs, 2004
- Physicians’ Use Of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And SolutionsHealth Affairs, 2004
- Benefits of and Barriers to Large Medical Group Practice in the United StatesArchives of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Physician Clinical Performance AssessmentJAMA, 2003
- External Incentives, Information Technology, and Organized Processes to Improve Health Care Quality for Patients With Chronic DiseasesJAMA, 2003
- Reflections on the ReflectionsJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001
- Uncertainty and The Welfare Economics of Medical CareJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999