The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making?
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Patient Education and Counseling
- Vol. 56 (3), 302-312
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.03.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The influence of IVF, multiple gestation and miscarriage on the acceptance of genetic amniocentesisPrenatal Diagnosis, 2003
- Risk factors predisposing to fetal loss following a second trimester amniocentesisBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: How well are we doing?American Journal of Medical Genetics, 2001
- Nuchal translucency and the acceptance of invasive prenatal chromosomal diagnosis in women aged 35 and olderObstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Nondirectiveness in Prenatal Genetics: patients read between the linesNursing Ethics, 1999
- Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)Social Science & Medicine, 1997
- Decision-making in the context of genetic riskPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Prenatal Genetic Testing and Geneticization: Mother Matters for AllFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1993
- The Choices Women Make about Prenatal DiagnosisFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1993
- Obstetricians presenting amniocentesis to pregnant women: Practice observedJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1993