Sulphadimidine Acetylation Test for Classification of Patients as Slow or Rapid Inactivators of Isoniazid
- 29 August 1970
- Vol. 3 (5721), 495-497
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5721.495
Abstract
Sulphadimidine acetylation studies were undertaken in 103 patients, 52 of whom had been classified as slow and 51 as rapid inactivators of isoniazid by a standard microbiological assay method. Each patient received sulphadimidine by mouth in a dose of 44 mg./kg. body weight, and free and total sulphadimidine were estimated in blood and urine collected at six hours. The findings suggest that patients may be classified as slow inactivators of isoniazid if the proportion of acetylated sulphadimidine (total minus free) is (a) less than 25% in blood or (b) less than 70% in urine. The sulphadimidine test is easy to perform and the result is available the same day; urine specimens for the test can be stored at room temperature for over a week without any loss of drug.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- An improved and simplified method of detecting the acetylator phenotype.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1969
- Madras study of supervised once-weekly chemotherapy.1968
- STUDIES ON METABOLIC BASIS FOR GENETICALLY DETERMINED CAPACITIES FOR ISONIAZED INACTIVATION IN MAN1965
- HUMAN ACETYLATION POLYMORPHISM1964
- NEW METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF N-ACETYL ISONIAZID IN URINE OF AMBULATORY PATIENTSPublished by Elsevier ,1964
- Genetical and Geographic Studies on Isoniazid InactivationScience, 1961
- Deterioration of isoniazid in frozen serum samples: a confirmatory note.Published by Elsevier ,1961
- Rate of inactivation of isoniazid in South Indian patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. 2. Clinical implications in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis with isoniazid either alone or in combination with PAS.1961
- Stability of Isoniazid in Aqueous Solutions and PlasmaExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1960
- Studies of Human Patterns of Isoniazid Metabolism Using an Intravenous Fall-off Technique with a Chemical Method1American Review of Respiratory Disease, 1960