Bicalutamide 150 mg plus standard care vs standard care alone for early prostate cancer
- 17 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 97 (2), 247-254
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.06051.x
Abstract
To evaluate, in the ongoing Early Prostate Cancer (EPC) trial programme, the efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide 150 mg once daily in addition to standard care for localized or locally advanced, nonmetastatic prostate cancer. The EPC programme comprises three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials designed for combined analysis. Following standard care, 8113 men with localized (T1-2, N0/Nx) or locally advanced (T3-4, any N; or any T, N+) prostate cancer (all M0) received oral bicalutamide 150 mg once daily or oral placebo. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. The large EPC trial programme is defining men who benefit or do not from early or adjuvant antiandrogen therapy. At a median follow-up of 7.4 years, in localized disease there is no benefit to PFS by adding bicalutamide to standard care, and there is a trend (hazard ratio, HR, 1.16; 95% confidence intervals, CI, 0.99-1.37; P = 0.07) towards decreased survival in patients otherwise undergoing watchful waiting. However, in locally advanced disease, bicalutamide significantly improved PFS irrespective of standard care. Bicalutamide significantly improved overall survival in patients receiving radiotherapy (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44-0.95; P = 0.03); this was driven by a lower risk of prostate cancer-related deaths. Bicalutamide produced a trend towards improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced disease otherwise undergoing watchful waiting (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66-1.01; P = 0.06). No survival difference was evident in the prostatectomy subgroup. This ongoing programme is clarifying the role of early or adjuvant antiandrogen therapy in prostate cancer. Patients with localized disease do not appear to derive clinical benefit from added bicalutamide. However, adding bicalutamide 150 mg to standard care provides significant clinical benefits in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, irrespective of primary therapy.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention and management of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain: randomized endocrinologic and clinical studies with tamoxifen and anastrozoleProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2005
- Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Flutamide as Adjuvant Treatment versus Observation after Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced, Lymph Node-Negative Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2004
- Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experimentBMJ, 2004
- Phase III Trial of Long-Term Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation After Neoadjuvant Hormonal Cytoreduction and Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Carcinoma of the Prostate: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92–02Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Zoledronic Acid to Prevent Bone Loss in Men Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Nonmetastatic Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2003
- Bicalutamide as Immediate Therapy Either Alone or as Adjuvant to Standard Care of Patients with Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer:Journal of Urology, 2002
- BICALUTAMIDE MONOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH CASTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONMETASTATIC LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: 6.3 YEARS OF FOLLOWUPJournal of Urology, 2000
- BICALUTAMIDE MONOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH CASTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONMETASTATIC LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: 6.3 YEARS OF FOLLOWUPJournal of Urology, 2000
- PROGRESSIVE OSTEOPOROSIS DURING ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2000
- Immediate Hormonal Therapy Compared with Observation after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Men with Node-Positive Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999