Empowering the public? Citizens' juries and the new genetic technologies
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Public Health
- Vol. 8 (3), 181-192
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09581599808402906
Abstract
The exploration of public views on complex health policy issues has used a number of methods ranging from surveys to focus groups. These have suffered from being primarily designed to collect information, rather than attempting to ameliorate the ‘democratic deficit’ in decision making, particularly in the introduction of the new genetic technologies. Citizens' juries have been promoted recently as an alternative to these more conventional approaches, and this paper evaluates a recent attempt to expand the scope of the citizens' jury to Wales, focusing on the introduction of genetic testing for common disorders.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social science and public health: issues of method, knowledge and powerCritical Public Health, 1997
- Misunderstanding Science?Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- The public understanding of science or the scientific understanding of the public? A review of the social context of the `new genetics'Public Understanding of Science, 1995
- Fairness and Competence in Citizen ParticipationPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: the implications of coronary candidacy for health education.Sociology of Health & Illness, 1991
- Participation and Democratic TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970