What's Happening in Quality Improvement at the Local Hospital: A State Wide Study From the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Medical Quality
- Vol. 15 (3), 106-113
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106286060001500304
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate what happened to improve the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at all 32 nonfederal hospitals in Connecticut and to assess the impact of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) on quality improvement (QI) activities for AML We performed a questionnaire study with secondary analyses using the CCP database. On-site interviews were conducted with QI directors at all 32 Connecticut nonfederal hospitals that participated in the Health Care Financing Administration's Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) in 1992-93 and 1995. The interviews sought information about the makeup of QI departments, specific approaches used to improve the care of patients with AMI, and the perceived value of the CCP to each individual hospital. Results showed that the number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) and FTEs per beds employed in QI departments ranged from 1 to 30 and from 0.4 to 7.9, respectively, with a registered nurse most often serving as the department head (27/32). Over half of the departments (17/32) had additional responsibilities. The majority (25/32) used some combination of physician champions, multidisciplinary QI teams, standing orders, or critical pathways to effect change in AMI care. Finally, 26 of the 32 hospitals believed the CCP was valuable because it provided credible benchmark data, a catalyst for change, or a specific focus on processes of care needing improvement in AML Despite great variability in institutional resources, all 32 hospitals used a similar combination of QI approaches to effect change in AMI care. However, there is variable scientific evidence supporting these approaches. Externally sponsored projects such as the CCP appear to play a useful role for individual hospitals. Defining the optimal methods of QI is difficult given that hospitals are using complex combinations of nonstandardized improvement interventions.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the Quality of Care for Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 1998
- Performance Reports on Quality -- Prototypes, Problems, and ProspectsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Quality of Care for Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 1995
- Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.Circulation, 1994
- The Quality of Care and the Quality of Measuring ItNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Reducing lengths of stay for patients hospitalized with chest pain using medical practice guidelines and opinion leadersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- The Health Care Quality Improvement InitiativePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Opinion Leaders vs Audit and Feedback to Implement Practice GuidelinesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (subcommittee to develop guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarction)Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989