Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 7 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Genetic Epidemiology
- Vol. 40 (4), 304-314
- https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21965
Abstract
Developments in genome-wide association studies and the increasing availability of summary genetic association data have made application of Mendelian randomization relatively straightforward. However, obtaining reliable results from a Mendelian randomization investigation remains problematic, as the conventional inverse-variance weighted method only gives consistent estimates if all of the genetic variants in the analysis are valid instrumental variables. We present a novel weighted median estimator for combining data on multiple genetic variants into a single causal estimate. This estimator is consistent even when up to 50% of the information comes from invalid instrumental variables. In a simulation analysis, it is shown to have better finite-sample Type 1 error rates than the inverse-variance weighted method, and is complementary to the recently proposed MR-Egger (Mendelian randomization-Egger) regression method. In analyses of the causal effects of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol on coronary artery disease risk, the inverse-variance weighted method suggests a causal effect of both lipid fractions, whereas the weighted median and MR-Egger regression methods suggest a null effect of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol that corresponds with the experimental evidence. Both median-based and MR-Egger regression methods should be considered as sensitivity analyses for Mendelian randomization investigations with multiple genetic variants.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council (MR/N501906/1)
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12013/1‐9)
- Wellcome Trust (100114)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficient Design for Mendelian Randomization Studies: Subsample and 2-Sample Instrumental Variable EstimatorsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Large-scale association analysis identifies new risk loci for coronary artery diseaseNature Genetics, 2012
- Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: a mendelian randomisation studyThe Lancet, 2012
- Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies: Approaches for Evaluating the Instrumental Variable AssumptionsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Major Lipids, Apolipoproteins, and Risk of Vascular DiseaseJAMA, 2009
- Lifelong Reduction of LDL-Cholesterol Related to a Common Variant in the LDL-Receptor Gene Decreases the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease—A Mendelian Randomisation StudyPLOS ONE, 2008
- Limits to Causal Inference based on Mendelian Randomization: A Comparison with Randomized Controlled TrialsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Using pseudo‐data to correct for publication bias in meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2005