American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Update 2010
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Vol. 60 (2), 70-98
- https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20066
Abstract
In 2009, the American Cancer Society (ACS) Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee began the process of a complete update of recommendations for early prostate cancer detection. A series of systematic evidence reviews was conducted focusing on evidence related to the early detection of prostate cancer, test performance, harms of therapy for localized prostate cancer, and shared and informed decision making in prostate cancer screening. The results of the systematic reviews were evaluated by the ACS Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee, and deliberations about the evidence occurred at committee meetings and during conference calls. On the basis of the evidence and a consensus process, the Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee developed the guideline, and a writing committee drafted a guideline document that was circulated to the entire committee for review and revision. The document was then circulated to peer reviewers for feedback, and finally to the ACS Mission Outcomes Committee and the ACS Board of Directors for approval. The ACS recommends that asymptomatic men who have at least a 10-year life expectancy have an opportunity to make an informed decision with their health care provider about screening for prostate cancer after they receive information about the uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. Prostate cancer screening should not occur without an informed decision-making process. Men at average risk should receive this information beginning at age 50 years. Men in higher risk groups should receive this information before age 50 years. Men should either receive this information directly from their health care providers or be referred to reliable and culturally appropriate sources. Patient decision aids are helpful in preparing men to make a decision whether to be tested. CA Cancer J Clin 20 10;60:70-98. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society, Inc.This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit:
- Yearly Prostate Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination Fluctuations in a Screened PopulationJournal of Urology, 2009
- Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Screening, Treatment, and Prostate Cancer Mortality in the Seattle Area and Connecticut: Fifteen-year Follow-upJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: A randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacyPatient Education and Counseling, 2008
- Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975–2004: an ecological studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2008
- Population-Based Case-Control Study of PSA and DRE Screening on Prostate Cancer MortalityUrology, 2007
- Prospective study of depression and fatigue in men with advanced prostate cancer receiving hormone therapyPsycho‐Oncology, 2007
- Specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen determination in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trialBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Detection of Life-Threatening Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity During a Window of CurabilityJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006