Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 36 (9), 860-867
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01301.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability and credibility of an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing using recent graduates as judgesMedical Education, 1999
- Relations Between Observed Item Difficulty Levels and Angoff Minimum Passing Levels for a Group of Borderline ExamineesApplied Measurement in Education, 1999
- Teachers' Ability to Estimate Item Difficulty: A Test of the Assumptions in the Angoff Standard Setting MethodJournal of Educational Measurement, 1998
- Relative or Absolute Standards in Assessing Medical Knowledge Using Progress TestsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 1998
- The Credibility and Comparability of StandardsApplied Measurement in Education, 1997
- Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculumMedical Teacher, 1996
- Research on Standards for Professional Licensure and Certification ExaminationsEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1994
- Generalizability theory.American Psychologist, 1989
- A Comparative Study of Standard-Setting MethodsApplied Measurement in Education, 1989
- The Effect of Various Factors on Standard SettingJournal of Educational Measurement, 1988