Reliability and credibility of an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing using recent graduates as judges
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 33 (11), 832-837
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00487.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teachers' Ability to Estimate Item Difficulty: A Test of the Assumptions in the Angoff Standard Setting MethodJournal of Educational Measurement, 1998
- Relative or Absolute Standards in Assessing Medical Knowledge Using Progress TestsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 1998
- The Credibility and Comparability of StandardsApplied Measurement in Education, 1997
- Introducing progress testing in McMaster Universityʼs problem-based medical curriculumAcademic Medicine, 1996
- Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculumMedical Teacher, 1996
- Report card from McMaster: student evaluation at a problem-based medical schoolThe Lancet, 1995
- The influence of progress tests and block tests on study behaviourInstructional Science, 1994
- Research on Standards for Professional Licensure and Certification ExaminationsEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1994
- The quarterly profile examinationAcademic Medicine, 1990
- The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical studentsMedical Education, 1983